Hill’s Pet Nutrition Inc. and PetSmart Inc. failed to convince a federal appeals court to revisit a decision that reinstated a proposed class suit alleging they overcharge for deceptively marketed prescription pet foods.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Oct. 3 denied the companies’ request for a panel rehearing or a rehearing by the full court.
Holly Vanzant and Dana Land alleged they bought prescription food for their cats because of the pets’ medical conditions. However, both said they learned the prescription food isn’t materially different from regular cat food and no prescription is necessary to buy...
To read the full article log in or if you would like to request a demo visit bloombergindustry.com
Related Posts :
LOLJWC Partners with Tractor Supply Co's to Collect Pet Food Supplies, Benefits Old Lyme Lyme Animal Control & Other Pet Welfare Organizations - lymeline.com- Ingredion, pet food ingredient supplier, malware statement - PetfoodIndustry.com
- 7 kibble extrusion challenges for modern dog, cat food - PetfoodIndustry.com
- Trade update on ag industry details stalemate with China, success with Japan - Pet Food Processing
- Argentinian pet food giants looking for new markets - PetfoodIndustry.com